- This post now also includes instructions for a more advanced kute-uchi braid called Genji Uchi, made using both the moves I teach in the two introductory videos below.
- See my post on the Kute-Uchi workshop I took at Braids 2012 for more about other types of Kute-uchi braids made using these two moves.
- Another interesting hand-held loop braiding tradition was used in pre-Incan Andean cultures to create the amazing “mummy braids” – see photos of hand-held loop braiding with over 60 loops at the end of that post (not a tutorial).
- Totally off-topic: at the end of the page below, I went on a bit about why I chose wordpress.com, and this particular format/theme for my site.
I recently dashed off two video tutorials on kute-uchi braiding—a Japanese hand-held loop braiding technique. This was in answer to a youtube video request from Petr in the Czech Repuplic! He is very interested in both Kute-uchi and Kumihimo braiding—has now acquired plans for a marudai and is building it himself.
Here are the 2 videos, each demoing one basic Kute-uchi move:
Below is a video demonstrating the “Outside-Around” move, also making a 5-loop braid
The “inside-through” move is basically identical to V-fell finger-held loop braiding. But there is no equivalent to the kute-uchi “outside-around” move in traditional fingerloop braiding.
Note—I just used “bare” loops in these videos. If you use kute (handles) to hold the loops, it will be easier to control the loops and to keep track of their order. Kute are not hard to make, see these ideas from Joy Boutrup and Maskako Kinoshita. (click link, then scroll down the footnotes on that page.) I didn’t use kute for any of the cotton and linen braids in the photo below, but I gather that fine silk would be very difficult to use without kute.
In the videos, I tried to hold all the loops spaced apart so they would be easy to see. This is not absolutely necessary or even practical, especially when braiding with more than five loops. Just try to keep them lined up in order.
Once you get used to these moves, you can try using 7 loops, and then more, to make larger versions with more color-pattern possibilities.
Both these two Kute-uchi moves can make a divided, square, and flat braid, pretty much just like the braids in my “Start Here” 5-loop tutorial for finger-held loop braiding.
New note: For making these simple square braids in the videos, traditional Kute-Uchi braiders would actually have used finger-held loops, as taught in my Start Here tutorial. According to Masako Kinoshita, hand-held loop braiding in Japan did not replace fingerloop braiding for simpler braids – fingerloop braiding has several advantages over handheld loop braiding if both are possible. But some more complex braids, like the Genji-Uchi braid below can only be made with hand-held loops. However, it’s easiest to learn hand-held loop braiding first with a simpler braid, like the 5-loop square braid, before moving on to more complex ones.
However, combining these two kute-uchi moves can produce some very interesting braids! Here is one example, these braids are color-pattern variations of a kute-uchi braid called “Genji-uchi“:
The examples above are 16- to 36-loop braids, which are equivalent to 32- to 72-tama (tama = bobbins) kumihimo braids. Even though they have different numbers of loops, they all have the same underlying structure—which is different from the square and flat braids of the two Kute-uchi videos above.
It’s created by alternating the two basic moves shown in the videos, and requires using a multiple of four loops. [click here for the instructions.] Masako Kinoshita’s term for this braid-shape is Genji-uchi. Apparently it looks very similar to a kumihimo braid called Maru-genji-gumi, but according to Kinoshita the kumihimo braid has a different structure—different from both true Genji-uchi, and from the braid she calls “Pseudo-genju-uchi” [which I teach below, along with the instructions for true Genji-uchi]
When I learned my first Kute-uchi braids, the Outside-Around move of my second video was a big surprise to me. I had never seen anything like it with finger-held loop braiding. The braids above were very novel, too. The structure is like 2 square braids enmeshed through each other. Hard to tell in a flat photo, but the braids are very solid, and round or squarish in shape, with 8 ridges (these are the narrow vertical columns of stacked threads—a regular square braid has 4 ridges).
Then a couple of years later I had another surprise, when I learned the 14th C. European “Sudarium braid,” done with finger-held loop braiding by two co-operating braiders (traditionally), which has a very similar shape—though produced by a very different method.
You can read more about Kute-uchi on Masako Kinoshita’s website L-MBRIC:
Kute-Uchi in Japanese means loop braiding in general. Masako Kinoshita coined the term, and according to her it includes finger-held loop braiding within its meaning. (Fingerloop braiding almost certainly preceded hand-held loop braiding historically, and would always be the preferred method for simple braids of 7 or fewer loops, in Japan as well as the two other places hand-held loop braiding is known or assumed: Oman, and ancient Peru).
None of this history was known until Masako Kinoshita discovered hints to the long-forgotten technique of kute-uchi in some old Japanese manuscripts. Amazingly, the documents revealed clues to the original method used for braiding the magnificent Japanese royal, samurai, and temple braids: hand-held loops and many cooperating braiders. This was completely counter to the theories of kumihimo historians at the time—they all believed the ancient braids had been made on braiding stands (marudai), even though a marudai big enough for the most complex of these braids would have to be so large that it could not be used by a single braider sitting in one place.
This is totally parallel to Noemi Speiser’s amazing discoveries from the 17th C. English loop braiding manuscripts. Speiser and Kinoshita were both discovering and decoding ancient loop braiding texts and braids at almost the same time, on opposite sides of the earth. Both of them had to use a lot of ingenuity—the instructions in both sets of manuscripts were obscurely written, and incomplete. The 17th C. English manuscripts, which were the first ones Speiser came upon, were written as if for readers who already understood the basic method and undefined shorthand terminology—most of the essential information was simply omitted.
Apparently the old Japanese manuscripts were written in secretive, veiled terms as if the writer didn’t really want anyone to understand it. A reluctant transcriber of proprietary guild secrets, perhaps. (That’s my own wildly speculative theory about a few of the 15th C English braid instructions, too—that they purposely described a more difficult and convoluted method for certain braids than the original transcriber him/herself may have used—Laces Dawns, Piol, and the Grene Dorge of 12 bows, for example.)
When Kinoshita came across the Japanese manuscript describing Kute-uchi braiding, the last practitioner of kute-uchi had been gone for almost a century, and the technique had been forgotten / sunk into obscurity for even longer, supplanted by Kumihimo stand-and-bobbin braiding.
Kinoshita was eventually able to prove to the initially skeptical Japanese Kumihimo community that it was hand-held loop braiding techniques, not marudais or any other types of braiding stands, that had been used to make the ancient, very intricate braids that are now national treasures in Japanese museums. The larger kute-uchi braids (kikko and other patterns) were made by two to four or even more braiders working together on one braid.
I took an introductory Kute-uchi workshop from kumihimo master Makiko Tada, who had learned the technique of Kute-uchi from Masako Kinoshita. It was a great workshop, and I spent a month afterward doing a lot of Kute-uchi braiding. Unfortunately I haven’t practiced it since. So I hope I am not leading anyone astray! (If any of my information here or in the videos is incorrect, please let me know.)
We learned many more braids than these enmeshed square braids, below is a photo of another type. This is a twined Kute-uchi braid (with very uneven tension!):
This is a simple version—the amazingly elaborate versions that were done in the past (I think only for royalty?) were much wider and more complex, with many rows of nested diamond shapes forming intricate patterns, not just one row of diamonds like my example. Makiko Tada has made incredible replicas of some of these ancient braids. This braiding structure is now usually done with Kumihimo braiding. A specialized braiding stand called a Karakumidai is used. Each pair of threads is wound on two bobbins which hang separately, rather than being held together as a loop, the way they were originally braided.
“Genji-Uchi” kute-uchi braid — first photo in post:
Here are text instructions for both Genji-Uchi and a very similar and possibly easier braid called Pseudo-genji-uchi:
First learn the braiding moves in both the videos above—Pseudo-genji and Genji-uchi use a combination of both those moves.
The minimum number of loops for Pseudo-Genji is four loops—2 loops on each hand. It will produce a very minimal braid, but is a good intro to learning it. I haven’t checked this, but I suspect that you might need to use a minimum of 8 loops for true Genji-Uchi — 4 may not “hold” (let me know if it works!)
An 8-loop version will look more like the braids in my photo.
The total number of loops must be a multiple of 4, (so 8, 12, 16, etc).
A great color pattern for learning Genji-uchi or Pseudo-genji-uchi:
Lengthwise columns of 2 different color-groups
Decide what colors you want half of the columns to be, and what colors you want the other columns to be.
CUT THE YARN: Half the loops should be color group X, and half should be color group Y. It’ll be easier to braid if at least one of these two groups is a single, distinctive color—say, all black. The other color group could be one other color, or a mix of colors, but if they are a mix of colors, each color should contrast well with black or it will be difficult to see which loops to braid.
ALTERNATE the two groups of colors [color group X and color group Y] when you arrange the loops onto each hand. The loops should be in X, Y, X, Y order on each hand…Meaning the same, (mirror-image) matching order on both hands). Unlike the braids in the videos, Genji-uchi and Pseudo- g.u start with the same number of loops on each hand.
So the loops should be, say: Black, Bright, Black, Bright (left to right) on the LEFT hand, with the same exact colors (but right to left) on the RIGHT hand.
EVERY OTHER LOOP will end up together in the braid, even though they are not together on your hands! So, in the finished braid, the ‘evens’ of each hand (say, color-group X) will all be stacked together in certain columns of the braid, and the ‘odds’ of each hand (color-group Y) will all be stacked together in other columns.*
[Later, if you use bicolor loops, you can have narrower columns of 4 different color-groups.]
The columns look clearer in the braid if one of the two color-groups is a single, solid color—say all black loops for the even-number loops (color-group X). This also makes it much easier to keep the loops in the correct order on your hands while you are braiding.
BRAID in pairs of moves from both the videos:
The first 2 loop transfers (left and right) will be outside-around moves from the second video, and the next 2 will be inside-through moves, demoed in the first video. Repeat in this way for the whole braid. If you’ve lined up your colors correctly, you will be making the outside-around moves on all the X colors, and inside-through moves on all the Y colors.
For Pseudo-genji-uchi: TURN all loops when transferring them.
For true Genji-uchi : TURN only the loops that go “outside-around,” and DON’T turn the loops that come “inside-through”.
[for a separate experiment, go ahead and try transferring loops without turning any of them—you’ll get an interesting result! Use a minimum of 8 loops…]
The two braids are very similar-looking. If you use bicolor loops, there will be a difference in where the colors end up in the vertical columns in Genji-uchi vs. Pseudo Genji-uchi.
I am not 100% sure that the true Genji-Uchi braid will work with only 4 loops, you’ll probably need to use 8. (let me know what happens if you try it with 4!) I do know that the “pseudo-genji-uchi”—turning all the loops—does work with only 4 loops, I tested that, then forgot to test it for the true Genji-uchi braid.
Try not to get the loops out of order, or the color-pattern will disappear. If you notice that they are out of order, get them back into that alternating x-color, y-color order and keep going. Keep alternating the two sets of moves.
Try other color-arrangements, but (for these two braid structures) always use the same two moves (2 outside-around, 2 inside-through, 2 outside-around, 2 inside-through, etc). And you must use 8, or 12, 16, 20, etc loops (a multiple of 4).
Other color patterns can be made than the ones I show and teach here. Experiment with different color set-ups on the hands to find others. For example, the colors don’t have to be columns. In the photo, the first two braids on the left have zigzag rows of colors. I think I must have set those up with every two (or 4?) loops of each hand the SAME color, alternating with two (4?) more loops of one other color. (This zigzag stripe pattern requires at least 8 loops, can’t be made with only 4, even with the pseudo-g.u braid.)
It should be possible to squeeze a third color into the sequence of zigzag stripes as well, to get, say a black, blue, black, tan order to the stripes, when seen from certain sides of the braid. I may have done this in those first two braids by using bicolor loops—each non-black loop made from both of the two non-black colors. (I’m too lazy to go check my old notes on these samples right now, but if you are interested, just ask, I do have notes on all of them.)
Other kute-uchi braids:
These same two braiding moves can produce several other types of braids, depending on:
A-the order of the moves
B-which if any loops are turned (left or right hands/ inside-through loops or outside around loops, both or neither)
C-whether the two hands hold an even or odd number of loops (or one hand even and the other odd). Unlike fingerloop braids, even-odd variations can cause dramatic changes to the form/shape of hand-held kute-uchi braids.
[The importance of odd vs. even numbers of loops on either or both of the two hands has to do with the amazing fact that some kute-uchi braids form in four layers. Fingerloop braids never form in more than two layers. In 2-layer loop braids (fingerloop or kute-uchi), the upper and lower layers of the braid directly correspond to/ are formed by the upper and lower shanks of the loops. In using loops to make the various types of four-layer kute-uchi braids, there are some mathematical constraints that don’t apply to two-layer braids.]
Two separate square braids made simultaneously, one above the other;
Four separate, stacked, narrow flat braids made simultaneously;
an 8-column wide, flat braid similar to the European-style flat double braid). It is braided as four layers, connected like a folded paper fan, that later are opened out into one flat, wide layer.
These braids are as intricate as typical European fingerloop two-worker braids (double braids), especially if you use 10 or more loops. On top of that, if you pair up with another braider and team braid, they can be combined to be even twice as large and intricate. Equivalent to a European 4-person braid!
Masako Kinoshita describes these kute-uchi braids on LMBRIC, in her illustrated instruction series on Kute-Uchi. The braid possibilities I itemized above would be in her list headed “Four-step Procedures,” because the braids have 4 loop transfers in each full cycle (repeat) of the braiding moves. Two-step procedures make simpler braids (square, flat and divided), that have only two loop transfers in each braiding cycle.
* There will be 4 color columns (two each of the two color-groups), but each color column is really made up of 2 adjacent (same-color) columns of slanting threads. However, if you used bicolor loops for this braid, you could use 4 color-groups, arranged so the braid would have eight (narrower) columns of these 4 colors.
About the change in my blog’s format:
My site is part of WordPress.com. [NOT WordPress.org!] WordPress.COM is a full-serve hosting platform that offers several ‘pre-fab’ blog formats/ looks (called “themes”), that you can switch between freely. I’m trying this new one mostly because the upper menu tabs stand out better than the ones in my old theme. I hope the overall change in the blog’s appearance isn’t too jarring!
Update Dec 2013 – after two years on that ‘new’ theme, I’ve just switched to yet another one that also has a prominent upper menu. It’s supposed to work better on different sized devices than the previous one did.
The main problem with using a typical blog format for a teaching/ information-based website is that all the published posts are displayed on the homepage in chronological order—newest on top. This is not necessarily good for a sequence of tutorials jumbled together with non-tutorial posts! That’s why I later added upper menu tabs so readers could find specific tutorials and other information without having to wade down the blog’s homepage.
It turns out that a wordpress blog can instead have a traditional ‘website’ look, with a static homepage, and the content all organized by upper or sidebar navigation menus. But by the time I discovered that, I decided I liked the blog format better. To me it looks more interesting if the home page changes occasionally, and apparently that also helps with google search ranking, which seems to be how most new readers arrive here.
Also, because I thought of this as a blog rather than a ‘website’, it was less intimidating to get it started. I didn’t feel that all the pieces had to be in place when I launched it, so it was slightly less scary to jump in and just start posting.
In case you are interested in starting your own blog or website, the main reason I chose WordPress.com (not wordpress.org, which is a completely different option!—see wordpress.com vs wordpress.org) rather than a self-hosted website (i.e. wordpress.org or other self-hosted installs) is that I didn’t have to understand anything about web design, html, etc in order to start my site, OR do my own spam-blocking or protection from being hacked. I’ve gradually come to understand html a little more now, but it wasn’t a prerequisite for getting this site started.
All I needed to know how to do was to read simple directions, type, and ask questions on the wordpress.com users forum when I ran into trouble.
With wordpress.com I suppose you have less ability to tinker with your site, but you get one that is already functional, with good spam control and stats monitoring, and almost zero chances of being hacked, which is not the case if you self-host. You can choose and switch between several different prefab “looks” (themes) whenever you want, and from my point of view there is a lot of freedom to alter the look of your site simply by changing themes, uploading your own header image, picking between various color options for each theme, etc. And more importantly, according to people who understand this stuff much better than I do, the WordPress.com platform has its own SEO (search engine optimization) magic that starts your blog off with much better visibility in online searches than your own self-hosted wordpress.org (or other) install would. That said, it took a lot of months before this site started to appear anywhere near the top 10 pages in a google search for loop braiding—be patient and keep posting, even if it seems at first that you are posting into a void.
Anyway, I’m hoping this new theme/format will be easier to read and navigate. What do you think??? If it doesn’t work out, I may try yet another one—so if everything looks different again the next time you visit, now you’ll know why!
© 2011–2017 Ingrid Crickmore
See full copyright restrictions and permissions at the bottom of the sidebar (if you are on a small screen device, the ‘sidebar’ may appear somewhere other than at the side of the screen).